The specific needs of highly myopic patients require special attention from Eye Care Professionals. This article describes both the visual discomfort and primary visual disorders associated with high myopia and explains the risks of visual impairment. It also discusses the specificities of refraction and the choice of optical equipment. In addition, it makes recommendations on frame selection and advises on the optimal selection of ophthalmic lenses. In recent years, the prevalence of myopia has been increasing in all regions of the world. As reported in many studies, myopia’s pandemic trends are putting researchers, clinicians, and the industry of ophthalmic optics on the alert. Two aspects are emphasized in the mid-term projections: the number of people affected by myopia worldwide will increase steadily and, among them, the proportion of cases with high myopia is also going to increase. Thus, the prevalence of myopia (individuals with mild to high myopia) in the world’s population could reach 25% by 2020 and nearly 50% by 2050, and the average prevalence of high myopia (over -5.00 D) would increase from 2.7% to almost 10% by 2050.1 In other words, myopic individuals would account for five billion people in 2050, and highly myopic individuals would account for one billion people (Fig. 1). These figures show the significance of the phenomenon that is now considered a major public health problem, and compel us to understand better the day-to-day discomfort felt by slightly and highly myopic people so as to improve their eye care management.
“The specific needs of highly myopic people require special attention from eye care professionals.”
1. Visual concerns of high myopia
1.1. Reduced visual acuity
One of the difficulties frequently encountered by highly myopic people is the difficulty to read the small print, despite wearing optimal correction. Karen Rose 2 measured the maximum acuity attained by 120 subjects with various degrees of myopia, which was offset by their usual correction (contact lenses, eyeglasses, etc.). The results showed an average loss of two acuity lines on a logarithmic scale (0.2 on the Minimum Angle of Resolution [MAR] log) between medium myopia (-1.50 to -3.75) and high myopia (beyond -10.00 D), objectifying the subjects’ problems.
1.2. Reduced contrast sensitivity
The Melbourne Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences 3 has measured the contrast sensitivity of various myopic subjects. Even after adjusting for the lenses’ minification effect, the contrast sensitivity determined for the 10 most myopic subjects (greater than -4.00 D) appears worse than for the others (Fig. 2). This explains the difficulty of deciphering low contrast characters, which is necessary in everyday life – when reading certain forms or newspapers, for example. This shows us the importance of measuring contrast sensitivity during a patient’s visual management in order to offer the proper solutions: for example, adding additional lighting can be useful since it allows for an increase in the apparent contrast of objects viewed.
1.3. Deteriorated vision thresholds under low and bright lights
The study by Mashige 4 on 100 subjects tells us about the need to suggest lighting that is neither too weak nor too strong for these myopic individuals. To that effect, he measured night vision thresholds and vision thresholds under the glare. For measuring night vision thresholds (light threshold level authorizing vision), he decreased ambient lighting until the subjects indicated that they could no longer see the target. The procedure to measure the thresholds of vision under glare was identical by simply adding a glare source. Results showed more significant vision thresholds for myopic than for hyperopic subjects (Fig. 3), which shows a relative weakness in the adaptability of myopic subjects at different light levels.
1.4. Increased recovery time after glare
In addition, the recovery time after glare, defined as the time required to regain the initial performance after being exposed to glare, is longer for myopic than for hyperopic subjects (Fig. 4), especially in subjects with a high degree of myopia. This shows, for example, the difficulties experienced by these highly myopic at the exit of a tunnel.
1.5. The decline in the quality of life and social impact
The VF-14 (result between 0-100) and the VQOL (0-5) are two questionnaires on quality of life that have been completed by subjects with different degrees of myopia.2 The results showed that the highest myopia levels are directly associated with lower general satisfaction in the achievement of all day-to-day living activities due to visual difficulties, particularly when driving. The study of these questionnaires reveals that the difficulties are not only visual but also concern aesthetics, practical and financial aspects. This decline in quality of life is essentially measured in subjects affected with high myopia (<-10.00 D). Accordingly, the social and psychological impact, resulting from their anguish of losing sight, is very significant.
2. Risks of visual impairment in high myopia
2.1. Pathologic myopia (retinopathy and maculopathy)
A person with high myopia presents a very significant risk of developing eye diseases, which can sometimes cause serious retinal damage 5 leading to various eye complications and subsequent deficiencies in the visual field. Indeed, the excessive axial elongation of the highly myopic eye may cause the mechanical stretching of the outer layers of the eyeball, resulting in such various pathological changes as staphylomas, atrophic lesions or chorioretinal cracks, choroidal neovascularization, and more (Fig. 5).6 The choroidal peripapillary and sub-foveal thinning, scleral thinning, and irregular deformations of the eyeball have been associated with various lesions in the case of high myopia. Given the increasing prevalence of high myopia, pathologic myopia (retinopathy and different categories of maculopathy 7) is likely to increase dramatically in the coming decades. Therefore, the detection of pathological changes should be evaluated early. Using advanced imaging technology could help identify people at risk and help in the management and monitoring of high myopia.
Beyond choroidal neovascularization and macular degeneration, high myopia has also been associated with the risk of other eye diseases, including glaucoma.8 Regarding cataracts and the potential association with high myopia, the results diverge depending on the study.9 Overall, high myopia is a major cause of visual impairment worldwide.10,11
2.2. Management of visual impairment
Pathological or not, high myopia often leads to significant visual impairment. Magnification needs thus become much more significant. Very often, highly myopic people remove their glasses for near vision. This allows them to avoid viewing too small objects (reduced in size by their lenses), as well as bringing documents too close to their eyes to magnify them.
When the need for magnification is more significant due to visual impairment, it is interesting to suggest a bright field magnifier, an optical system that is placed directly on a document, thus allowing for magnification of the text and offering a high apparent contrast via the concentration of light. Note that it is imperative to adapt the magnifier in relation to the focus distance of the myopic readers when they take off their glasses.
Electronic systems can, in the same way, meet even greater magnification requirements and are the only ones able to offer colourful image processing or reversed contrasts to optimise the vision of those with high myopia.
Significant light sensitivity, as reported in high myopia and visual impairment involves testing colour filters that can optimize vision while reducing the risk of glare. The analysis of lighting environments at work and at home, the elimination of sources of glare, and the addition of spotlights can help highly myopic people in achieving their daily tasks.
3. Specificities of refraction in high myopia
In the case of high myopia, it is important to practice comprehensive measurements of visual functions and to prioritise those functions that are the most impacted (e.g., visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, glare, etc.). Attention should be paid to day-to-day situations in which patients experience discomfort (low and bright lights, night vision, etc.). The refraction of high myopia requires special precautions 12, especially complete control of the distance between the glass and the eye (Fig. 6). It is therefore preferable for the prescription to be filled, or at least finalised, with trial frames. The lenses should be placed near the eye and, if possible, to the rear of the trial frame to ensure the closest simulation of the conditions in which the final frames will be worn. If the prescription is of very high power and is beyond the capabilities of the refractor orthe trial lenses, the refraction will be carried out over the patient’s current glasses (over-refraction technique) with additional lens support placed on the patient’s frames. A person with high myopia often suffers from relatively low visual acuity and is therefore not very sensitive to small variations of sphere and a cylinder of 0.25 D; 0.50 D variations will thus be preferred during the examination. As with any conventional refraction 13, it can be started with measurements from the autorefractometer’s refraction or the prescription previously worn by the patient. To determine the sphere, the fogging method can be used, with a high fog (+2.50 D) and larger increments of 0.50 D. To confirm the axis and the power of astigmatism, a ± 0.50 D cross-cylinder will be more efficient than a ± 0.25 D cross cylinder.
A very important aspect of the refraction of high refractive errors is the inclusion of the vertex distance: it can significantly alter the value of the prescription. The closer the lens is to the myopic eye, the lesser its power needs to be concave; the principle is to always match the lens’ image focal point with the far point of the eye (Fig. 6). A person with -20.00 D myopia with a prescription based on a 12 mm vertex distance will thus need a prescription of -19.25 D if the lens is placed at 10 mm and of -20.75 D if it is placed at 14 mm.
Conversely, presbyopic people with high myopia can help their near vision by creating an additive effect by simply pushing their glasses farther away: for example, a person with -20.00 D myopia who pushes his or her glasses away by 4 mm thus creates an addition of about 1.50 D.
3. The importance of frame choice
The choice of frames is especially important with high myopia. The frame should be small to allow its positioning close to the patient’s eyes and, if possible, with offset joints that reduce the size of the lenses and ensure proper distribution of the lenses around the eyes. The optician will adjust it to ensure that the lens is perpendicular to the direction of the gaze when the eye is in its primary position. The choice of the frame will also take into account the insertion height of the temples in the frame front according to the frame position on the nose and the ears; the temples will be adapted accordingly. Before measuring the right and left pupillary distances and heights, the final frame is to be perfectly adjusted to the patient’s face. Finally, the vertex distance will be systematically measured or otherwise evaluated in order to confirm the refraction.
5. Special lenses for high myopia
To meet the needs of high myopia, manufacturers offer special lenses designed to reduce the edge’s thickness, commonly covering a power range of up to -40.00 D in single vision and -25.00 D for progressive lenses. Different techniques are used, sequentially or simultaneously, to reduce the thickness at the edge of the lens (Fig. 7): an increase of the refractive index causes the flattening of the two surfaces, thereby thinning the lens’ edge; for example, with an n = 1.67 index material, a -15.00 D lens can have a thickness that is close to that of a -10.00 D lens made of a classic material with an n = 1.50 index (Fig. 7a and b); the reduction of the optical aperture or a “lenticular” lens will allow the thickness to be reduced even more significantly. It involves the creation of a facet at the rear edge of the lens, which divides the lens into two parts – a central, “optical” zone and a peripheral “facet” – and considerably improves aesthetics (Fig. 7c to e). This facet can be optically concave (negative power), plano (no power) or convex (positive power), according to the desired thickness reduction (Fig. 7c, d, e). Moreover, the smoothing of the edge (Fig. 8) improves aesthetics and minimizes the image’s doubling effect at the limit of the optical zone. It nevertheless creates a blurred vision zone that is often far enough to the side so as to avoid hindering the wearer whose lenses are placed close to the eye.
The higher the power of the prescription, the more the central optical zone is reduced (30, 25 and 20 mm) in order to achieve prescriptions of up to -40.00 D (Fig. 7f). For such a power, one can opt for bi-concave lenses whose power is negative on both sides and can achieve extreme power that can even exceed -100 D with a bi-concave and bilenticular lens!14
The front faces of these lenses are very flat, generating lots of reflections that are very visible; it is, therefore, indispensable for their surfaces to be treated with antiglare (anti-reflective) coating as long as it is technically feasible.
5.1. Concave lenticular lenses
In order to achieve a high power lens with great aesthetics, manufacturers are producing so-called “lenticular” lenses. They are composed of a central optical zone and a non-corrective annular zone on the periphery called the facet. These two zones can be either separate, with a visible edge separation, or continuously connected via the smoothing of this edge (Fig. 8).
The vision of a person with high myopia that has been corrected with ophthalmic lenses
During the optical correction of high myopia, several specific optical phenomena occur.15,16 They can be summarized as follows:
6.1. Lesser accommodation and lesser convergence
Through his or her ophthalmic lenses, a highly myopic person will accommodate and converge less than would an emmetropic or hyperopic person and less than if fitted with contact lenses. Indeed, the vertex distance plays a significant role, and its effects are all the more significant when the power is strong. For example, a person with -20.00 D myopia, who would apparently accommodate to 5.00 D to focus at an object 20 cm from his or her glasses, actually accommodates to approximately 3.10 D if the lens is placed at 12 mm from the eye. Similarly, although it seems as though such patients converge substantially to look 20 cm away, their convergence effort is actually much less due to the basic internal prismatic effects provided by their lenses at near vision.
6.2. Reduced visual acuity
With high myopia, the vertex distance causes a minification effect (reduction in size) in both the images seen by wearers through their lenses and the wearer’s eyes as seen by other people. Due to this reduction in size, wearers with high myopia usually have significantly lower visual acuity with ophthalmic lenses than with contact lenses. The minification effect, mainly caused by the vertex distance, is given by the following formula: where d = vertex distance and P = power of the lens (Fig. 9).
For example, for a -20.00 D lens placed at 12 mm, the minification effect is about 20%. Accordingly, if a patient’s maximum acuity was 20/20 with contact lenses, it may only be 20/25 with eyeglasses simply due to this optical effect. That is one reason why opticians should always seek a frame that is positioned closer to the patient’s eyes to minimize this effect as much as possible. As it has already been reminded, it is imperative to validate refraction specifically for that particular vertex distance.
6.3. Peripheral image duplication
Image duplication occurs at the edge of lenses with strong negative power. Indeed, the last beam of light passing through the lens is refracted towards the outside, and the first external beam of light on the outside of the lens is not refracted. The same object is thus seen twice, once sharply within the lens and once blurred on the outside of the lens. For the wearer, this means that the peripheral image, or its perception, is doubled at the edge of the lens (or the edge of the central optical zone), especially if the edge of the frame is thin or missing (rimless frames or those with a nylon thread).
6.4. The phenomenon of the myopic rings
One of the particularities of the correction of high myopia with ophthalmic lenses is the emergence of unsightly rings on the periphery of the lens, which is more visible when looking at the wearer sideways. These rings are the images at the edge of the lens reflected multiple times on the front and back of the lens. Polishing the lens edge and/or reducing the optical aperture considerably decreases them.
7. The convenience of special lenses for high myopia
Surgical treatment or contact lenses cannot be used for all highly myopic patients, and ophthalmic lenses are still relevant for high myopia. A wide range of lenses with powers commonly reaching -40.00 D in single vision lenses and -25.00 D in progressive lenses are available, and the technical know-how of the lens manufacturer can go even further. Recently, a record -108.00 D myopia was corrected with ophthalmic lenses by an alliance of French-Slovak experts.17 With careful, precise implementation by the optician, the wearer benefits from a comfortable visual experience. These special lenses, meant for extreme prescriptions, remain insufficiently known of and used by Eye Care Professionals, and would be of great service to the highly myopic population, which continues to grow in numbers.
The number of young and older adults with high myopia will increase in the future. Their care requires precise measurement of several visual functions and under various conditions to understand the origin of their discomfort. It is also necessary to carefully study all the parameters affecting the final refraction, from the visual exam to the adaptation of the optical equipment. Moreover, it seems imperative to study the difficulties patients encounter in their entirety to offer comprehensive, multidisciplinary care. •
- Holden B, Fricke T, Wilson D, et al. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050; Ophthalmology, 2016.
- Holden B, Fricke T, Wilson D, et al. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050; Ophthalmology, 2016.
- Rose K, Harper R, Tromans C. Quality of life in myopia, Br. J. Ophthalmol, 2000.
- Jaworski A, Gentle A, Zele AJ, Vingrys AJ, McBrien NA, Altered Visual Sensitivity in Axial High Myopia: A Local Postreceptoral Phenomenon?, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2006.
- Mashige K, Night vision and glare vision thresholds and recovery time in myopic and hyperopic eyes; African Vision and Eye Health 2010, S Afr Optom.
- Verkicharla PL, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Current and predicted demographics of high myopia and an update of its associated pathological changes, Ophthalmologic & physiological optics. 2015
- Wong TY et al. Epidemiology and disease burden of pathologic myopia and myopic choroidal neovascularization: an evidence-based systematic review. Am J Ophthalmol, 2014.
- Ohno-Matsui K, Kawasaki R, Jonas JB et al. International photographic classification and grading system for myopic maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol, 2015.
- Morgan IG1, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Myopia. Lancet. 2012 May 5; 379 (9827): 1739-48.
- Pan CW, Cheng CY, Saw SM, Wang JJ, Wong TY. Myopia and age-related cataracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov; 156(5): 1021-1033.